Absurd teater - en ny tendens?

[jensen jr. 603]

• 
• 
• 

TheLion skrev, for 5 timer siden:

Når først kattene er ude af posen, eller hvad er det, at man siger? 

 

Jeg tror du mener: Når ånden først er sluppet ud af flasken.

[jensen jr. 603]

Svendsenaalborg skrev, for 25 minutter siden:

Jeg tænker, at, i hvert fald, @Tantra og jeg har vidt forskellig opfattelse af, hvad et site som dette er, og hvordan det bør anvendes; fx hvornår og hvordan det er hensigtsmæssigt at blande sig. 
Du må køre din forretning, som du vil, men din ageren her på sitet undrer mig en del. Den er i hvert fald meget personligt orienteret, og ind i mellem temmelig  nærtagende, og så bliver tingene hurtigt uklare og grumsede. 
Måske skulle du nogle gange bare lade folks skriverier tale for sig selv. Det kan godt virke utroværdigt med alenlange følelsesfyldte forsvarsskrifter.

Ja, ach mein Gott. Einem ist die Welt rot, und einem ist sie schwarz.

[Tantra 1626]

Svendsenaalborg skrev, 1 time siden:

Jeg tænker, at, i hvert fald, @Tantra og jeg har vidt forskellig opfattelse af, hvad et site som dette er, og hvordan det bør anvendes; fx hvornår og hvordan det er hensigtsmæssigt at blande sig. 
Du må køre din forretning, som du vil, men din ageren her på sitet undrer mig en del. Den er i hvert fald meget personligt orienteret, og ind i mellem temmelig  nærtagende, og så bliver tingene hurtigt uklare og grumsede. 
Måske skulle du nogle gange bare lade folks skriverier tale for sig selv. Det kan godt virke utroværdigt med alenlange følelsesfyldte forsvarsskrifter.

How would you react if someone tried to make up stories about you?

However, nothing will be blurry and gloomy. That's another absurd interpretation, whether consciously or not - I don't have to judge about that.

Your hypotheses and made-up reasons and possible causes for anything have nothing to do with the facts.

As clearly seen here, humans are herd animals and when some see someone already making up stories about someone or trying to attack someone indirectly, some feel "invited" to join in. The "birth" of this thread and the "participation" of some is the best and most shameful example of this.

I would like to go into the question briefly here, which apparently did not fail to have the "effect":

@Sisseckhas absolutely no interest in me or my service. He also knows that, I would never meet him. He just made up a question after already sabotaging a thread and insulting me just to associate me with a disgusting service I would never do. It wasn't about questions, it was about the questioner and whya"he" is asking. He just wanted to cast doubt that I might be doing more in secret than I'm actually doing. He seems to have done that well. Some already have "question marks in their heads".

But you have to  "followed" the entire story to see the background.
The @Sisseckdoesn't have to ask for others. An interested gentleman can speak and ask for himself.

Nevertheless, I'll answer the question again here: all sex menus contain exactly THAT what is stated - no more and no less.

Hug

Redigeret 30. Maj, 2022 af Tantra

[TheLion 634]

*Det bør nok også pepeges, at det med at tale ned om andre/disse dem er meget slet adfærd, hvilket igen er noget, som man sikkert kunne skyde andre i skoene (selvfølgelig med plads til et glimt i øjet).

 

 

 

Redigeret 30. Maj, 2022 af TheLion

[TheLion 634]

Svendsenaalborg skrev, for 1 time siden:

Jeg tænker, at, i hvert fald, @Tantra og jeg har vidt forskellig opfattelse af, hvad et site som dette er, og hvordan det bør anvendes; fx hvornår og hvordan det er hensigtsmæssigt at blande sig. 
Du må køre din forretning, som du vil, men din ageren her på sitet undrer mig en del. Den er i hvert fald meget personligt orienteret, og ind i mellem temmelig  nærtagende, og så bliver tingene hurtigt uklare og grumsede. 
Måske skulle du nogle gange bare lade folks skriverier tale for sig selv. Det kan godt virke utroværdigt med alenlange følelsesfyldte forsvarsskrifter.

 

Jeg tænker igen, at vi skal passe på med at skyde andre folk ting i skoene - også Tantra her. Men det er korrekt, at der skal holdes skabe klare linjer mellem både angrebsskrifter og følelser. Er det noget, at nogen kender noget til? (selvfølgelig med plads til et glimt i øjet).

 

jensen jr. skrev, for 59 minutter siden:

Ja, ach mein Gott. Einem ist die Welt rot, und einem ist sie schwarz.

 

Jeg gør det ikke i de tyske. Hvad med USA? Peut-être?

 

jensen jr. skrev, 1 time siden:

Jeg tror du mener: Når ånden først er sluppet ud af flasken.

 

Udtrykket findes ikke på dansk, men er engelsk. "The genie is out of the bottle". Men du kan selv være en "bottle" kan du.

 

 

Jeg tror, at jeg i hvert fald skærer igennem her (moderatorer må selv vælge, hvad de vil - åbenlyst) og endnu engang vil slå et slag for at tale pænt om både escort-piger og brugere. Og så videre. Som jeg skrev: Mere om kroppens anatomi coming op.

 

Rigtig god mandag

 

 

/TheLion.

Redigeret 30. Maj, 2022 af TheLion

[Tantra 1626]

TheLion skrev, for 1 time siden:

*Det bør nok også pepeges, at det med at tale ned om andre/disse dem er meget slet adfærd, hvilket igen er noget, som man sikkert kunne skyde andre i skoene (selvfølgelig med plads til et glimt i øjet).

 

 

 

I would like to point out that it is impolite to pillory people and create extra threads for it.

Especially if you've done this twice with another girl in the past. Then it is not an exception, but a very unsightly habit.

 When a person is being sabotaged and downright "haunted" by malicious people for two months, and someone is constantly trying to ruin "your" reputation with made-up stories and make you appear negative - then at some point the patience of the most patient person will run out.

Then someone else comes along and creates a new thread to "invite" others to invent even more absurd stories.- I didn't create the thread and didn't ask that someone dig through this garbage and invent more unrealistic theories.

If you then reply hypocritically as a TS of a supposed thread and indirectly "push" others to continue - at this point we can no longer talk about behavior.

[AalborgLook 5168]

Tantra skrev, for 55 minutter siden:

I would like to point out that it is impolite to pillory people and create extra threads for it.

Especially if you've done this twice with another girl in the past. Then it is not an exception, but a very unsightly habit.

 When a person is being sabotaged and downright "haunted" by malicious people for two months, and someone is constantly trying to ruin "your" reputation with made-up stories and make you appear negative - then at some point the patience of the most patient person will run out.

Then someone else comes along and creates a new thread to "invite" others to invent even more absurd stories.- I didn't create the thread and didn't ask that someone dig through this garbage and invent more unrealistic theories.

If you then reply hypocritically as a TS of a supposed thread and indirectly "push" others to continue - at this point we can no longer talk about behavior.

Hvis en tråd eller et indlæg går over stregen skal det anmeldes, så moderator teamet kan tage stilling til det.
Finder de den ok er det rimeligt lige meget hvad du syntes er rigtigt og forkert.

[TheLion 634]

Tantra skrev, 1 time siden:

I would like to point out that it is impolite to pillory people and create extra threads for it.

Especially if you've done this twice with another girl in the past. Then it is not an exception, but a very unsightly habit.

 When a person is being sabotaged and downright "haunted" by malicious people for two months, and someone is constantly trying to ruin "your" reputation with made-up stories and make you appear negative - then at some point the patience of the most patient person will run out.

Then someone else comes along and creates a new thread to "invite" others to invent even more absurd stories.- I didn't create the thread and didn't ask that someone dig through this garbage and invent more unrealistic theories.

If you then reply hypocritically as a TS of a supposed thread and indirectly "push" others to continue - at this point we can no longer talk about behavior.

Sorry, but I really don’t know you. I just told one of the other users to be kind to you. I think it should be clear to everyone that attacking people is the wrong way to go. I can only urge you to take a deep look in the mirror, but this thread has honestly nothing to do with you. But interesting this thing with stalking, harassment and trying to ruin people’s reputation for several months. Or maybe even years. I wouldn’t say you would do that as such but who would? Hmm…

 

I really don’t get the TS thing by the way? Probably you should ask somebody else.

 

Have a good day 

Redigeret 30. Maj, 2022 af TheLion

[TheLion 634]

AalborgLook skrev, for 11 minutter siden:

Hvis en tråd eller et indlæg går over stregen skal det anmeldes, så moderator teamet kan tage stilling til det.
Finder de den ok er det rimeligt lige meget hvad du syntes er rigtigt og forkert.

Der foregår helt sikkert nogle ting, der er værd at kigge på. Det er helt sikkert noget for moderator-teamet og nok også evt. ordensmagten. Se evt. mit sidste svar. For jo. Der er helt sikkert noget, der er god adfærd og noget, der ikke er. Eller “rigtigt” og “forkert.” Det tror jeg også, at de mennesker, der gør det, selv er klar over 

Redigeret 30. Maj, 2022 af TheLion

[Bananas 17206]

Jeg tror nok Becket ville synes at hele EG er en totalt absurd forestilling. Mere absurt end noget han kunne finde på. Det er fænomenet som er absurt, ikke en enlig tråd eller flere. Men indrømmes; den her tråd er rimeligt absurd.

Jeg synes nok moderatorer griber ind i ny og næ, nogle gange forstår jeg det - andre ikke. Og det har ikke sjældent handlet om anmeldelser - også af udenlandske piger som ikke er herinde. Er selv blevet bannet fra tråde nogle gange.

Og bundlinien er: det er vel ikke så meget at snakke om? Der sidder nogle stakkels moderatorer som på fri tid (og uden betaling hvis jeg forstår det rigtigt), skal forsøge holde nogen slags orden herinde - selvfølgelig kan noget nogle gange fremstå som absurt. Nogen gang for dig, en anden gang for mig eller nogen anden. 

Men jeg tror faktiskt Becket ville få nogle nye fantastiskt absurde idéer hvis han fik tilgang til EG.  Ikke mindst omkring at intet kan være småt nok ikke at blive ophidset over, og hvor gemene folk kan være bag anonymitetens skjold.
 

[Guest Sisseck]

Nu ved jeg ikke lige hvorfor netop jeg er blevet genstand for @Tantra ‘s vrede. Det er mit indtryk, at det lige så godt kunne have været en anden.

Nuvel. Bare lige for at kommentere kort på enkelte ting i tråden, der sprang mig i øjnene.

1) Jeg er IKKE blevet afvist af Magnolie, som der skrives. Var jeg rent faktisk blevet det, havde det selvfølgelig været okay.

2) Jeg spørger til COF, da det evt. kunne vække min interesse i at besøge Magnolie. At et spm. der stilles i ‘Anmeldelser’ næsten dagligt sidestilles med ‘Sabotage’ virker meget voldsomt. 

3) Magnolie kalder COF for en ‘Modbydelig ydelse’ her i tråden. Dermed taler hun ned til rigtigt mange brugere der efterspørger netop denne ydelse og som flere også praktiserer i privaten…faktisk noget som mange piger syntes er frækt. Men Magnolie DØMMER lige alle med sin udtalelse…

4) Jeg ved ikke hvad der er hændt Magnolie i fortiden (her på forum og) som GP,  men sitet her kræver udover respekt også at man kan trives i et univers hvor sprogbrug og spørgsmål kan variere og ikke altid udtrykkes poetisk. Jeg har læst med on/off siden 00’erne (Venuslogen hed det vidst dengang) og læst rigtigt mange skæve skriv. Magnolie kan ikke forvente særstatus, mig bekendt.

5) Har som tidligere nævnt læst 2 anmeldelser af Magnolie, men jeg kan næsten forstå at ‘Sabotagen’ har fundet stedet i meget lang tid? Det er selvfølgelig ærgerligt med kritik, men vel næppe et decideret komplot? Var der én der kritiserede prisen og nærmest blev skriftligt korsfæstet? Slap nu af.

Der er sikkert mere her i tråden, der kunne fortjene en lille bemærkning, men først og fremmest vil jeg sige at Magnolies ageren herinde virker usædvanlig vred og dobbeltmoralsk (Læs: ‘COF er en modbydelig ydelse’. Gad vide hvad alle de kvinder der tilbyder dette - og deres kunder - syntes om et sådanne statement? Hvordan mon de føler sig? Ak ja). Måske EG slet ikke er hende?

VH Sisseck
 

 

 

Redigeret 30. Maj, 2022 af Sisseck

[jensen jr. 603]

TheLion skrev, for 4 timer siden:

Udtrykket findes ikke på dansk, men er engelsk. "The genie is out of the bottle". Men du kan selv være en "bottle" kan du.

Det kan jeg da love dig for at det gør.

[Tantra 1626]

Sisseck skrev, for 50 minutter siden:

Nu ved jeg ikke lige hvorfor netop jeg er blevet genstand for @Tantra 

Der er sikkert mere her i tråden, der kunne fortjene en lille bemærkning, men først og fremmest vil jeg sige at Magnolies ageren herinde virker usædvanlig vred og dobbeltmoralsk 

 

 

 

Stop being hypocritical now. Now that's some more fabricated, bottomless insinuations on your part - you like to "paint" me in a bad light. That's pretty defamatory.

You already insulted me badly in the cleaned thread that you sabotaged and explained that I am active in the forum and write indifferent posts and such women "don't turn you on". In the other you worded the question on purpose to create doubt, so people think it might offer more than what I'm saying.

What is your reason for sabotage? - Why are you sabotaging?
a beautifully written review just to say that the girl the reviewer had a nice experience with is active on the forum, the girl isn't hitting on him and he doesn't want to visit her (?) - that's clearly sabotage and that was told to you by several users.

And what is the reason your posts here(?) - you "search" and invent reasons to make me appear negative. Stop following me, sabotaging me, making up stories about me. Take care of yourself and your behavior.

I still have my reply from the thread as text if you can't remember you're not welcome. Here's a reminder for you, and I hope that ends your attempts to somehow portray me in a negative light.:

Dear @Sisseck

WOW... Remarkable.

You notice my activity in the forum. How wonderful. Did you notice what this thread is about? It's a reviews thread - or do you think it's a general debate about girls being active on the forums? - I do not think so.

By the way, if you took the time to read  the threads I have posted in, then you would know I only receive a  maximum of 3 customers on the days I am active. You don't have to start making up stories about it. I don't want to receive more. I've adapted my concept for the great gentlemen I wish to meet. Yes, I choose my clients carefully and not everyone is invited. I am happy with my approach. I design each meeting individually, tailored to each and every great gentleman, who appreciate that very much.

I don't welcome you, so keep clicking.
Why do men that are not "invited" feel the need to  leave insulting, condescending, sometimes hateful comments  - with the clear aim of shining a negative light on a person that doesn't welcome them  - such behavior, while hiding behind anonymity,  reveals how petty and maliciously some " little men" can be

Redigeret 30. Maj, 2022 af Tantra

[People Pleaseren 873]

@Tantra: Jeg har ikke noget dårligt at sige om dig. Du er sikkert en sød og dejlig person. Men når du fremstår som loyal overfor/allieret med den klart mest (by far) irriterende person på det her forum, så vil det nok helt naturligt medføre en del modvilje mod dig fra mange brugere. Bare for at give en mulig forklaring. Personligt sætter jeg pris på at du er så aktiv som du er.

[Tantra 1626]

People Pleaseren skrev, for 10 minutter siden:

@Tantra: Jeg har ikke noget dårligt at sige om dig. Du er sikkert en sød og dejlig person. Men når du fremstår som loyal overfor/allieret med den klart mest (by far) irriterende person på det her forum, så vil det nok helt naturligt medføre en del modvilje mod dig fra mange brugere. Bare for at give en mulig forklaring. Personligt sætter jeg pris på at du er så aktiv som du er.

I do not really understand? Who should I be "connected" to? I am not affiliated with anyone. only with myself 

Hug

[Guest Sisseck]

Tantra skrev, for 34 minutter siden:

Stop being hypocritical now. Now that's some more fabricated, bottomless insinuations on your part - you like to "paint" me in a bad light. That's pretty defamatory.

You already insulted me badly in the cleaned thread that you sabotaged and explained that I am active in the forum and write indifferent posts and such women "don't turn you on". In the other you worded the question on purpose to create doubt, so people think it might offer more than what I'm saying.

What is your reason for sabotage? - Why are you sabotaging?
a beautifully written review just to say that the girl the reviewer had a nice experience with is active on the forum, the girl isn't hitting on him and he doesn't want to visit her (?) - that's clearly sabotage and that was told to you by several users.

And what is the reason your posts here(?) - you "search" and invent reasons to make me appear negative. Stop following me, sabotaging me, making up stories about me. Take care of yourself and your behavior.

I still have my reply from the thread as text if you can't remember you're not welcome. Here's a reminder for you, and I hope that ends your attempts to somehow portray me in a negative light.:

Dear @Sisseck

WOW... Remarkable.

You notice my activity in the forum. How wonderful. Did you notice what this thread is about? It's a reviews thread - or do you think it's a general debate about girls being active on the forums? - I do not think so.

By the way, if you took the time to read  the threads I have posted in, then you would know I only receive a  maximum of 3 customers on the days I am active. You don't have to start making up stories about it. I don't want to receive more. I've adapted my concept for the great gentlemen I wish to meet. Yes, I choose my clients carefully and not everyone is invited. I am happy with my approach. I design each meeting individually, tailored to each and every great gentleman, who appreciate that very much.

I don't welcome you, so keep clicking.
Why do men that are not "invited" feel the need to  leave insulting, condescending, sometimes hateful comments  - with the clear aim of shining a negative light on a person that doesn't welcome them  - such behavior, while hiding behind anonymity,  reveals how petty and maliciously some " little men" can be

@Tantra Jeg begynder ganske enkelt at tro, at du ikke forstår dansk på skrift i tilstrækkelig grad eller også vælger du kun at kommentere på de ting, som passer ind i din store ‘offerrolle’ mod alle ‘sabotørerne’. Det er jo ét stort komplot mod dig, skal du huske…eller også er det ikke. Mit seneste indlæg her i tråden virker det ihvertfald til at du har plukket gevaldigt i eller ganske enkelt ikke har forstået…

Nu stopper min kommunikation med dig og jeg vil overlade dig til poesien og drømmen om den pletfri anmeldelse. Men prøv lige at læs mit seneste indlæg én gang til. Fremover kunne du jo også overveje at omtale dine kolleger og kunderne hér på EG med en smule respekt og ikke som var du træt af faget…lad dramaet stoppe.

Jeg ønsker dig en god aften