After reading positive reviews about Natural Sara https://www.eroguide.dk/massage-escort/Sara.C/ I paid a visit this week 
Sara was distant, introvert and mechanic in her approach. I am not sure if she had been having too many customers or a bad experience previously but I left disappointed. 

Tak for at dele, men ... jeg er altid forbeholden overfor helt nye brugere der ser ud til at oprette sig kun for at advare. Alt for ofte handler det om fx intern splid, en afvist kunde eller lignende. Først når du har anmeldt flere og/eller kommenteret på andre anmeldelser kan vi være nogenlunde trygge ved at anmeldelsen er reel.

Jeg har ikke selv besøgt Sara, men fandt en anden tråd fra bruger med flere anmeldelser i bagagen. Den står i ret skarp kontrast til din oplevelse.

 

Jeg har altid undret mig over behovet for at kommentere på en brugers 1. anmeldelse. Brug den eller lad være, og kom videre.

Jeg havde samme oplevelse med Sara. Hun var en skuffelse. Ingen indlevelse eller engagement.

Jeg kan også tilslutte mig. Hun virkede som en der slet ikke nød sit arbejde det mindste. På ingen måde pengene værd. 

hfh skrev, for 7 timer siden:

After reading positive reviews about Natural Sara https://www.eroguide.dk/massage-escort/Sara.C/ I paid a visit this week 
Sara was distant, introvert and mechanic in her approach. I am not sure if she had been having too many customers or a bad experience previously but I left disappointed. 

Fedt at du skriver en anmeldelse, jeg ville råde dig til at være aktiv med kommentarer og den slags, inden du ligger en anmeldelse op. Vi har alt for mange der laver fake, hadfulde, eller reklame anmeldelser op og fælles for dem alle er at de er nye profiler. ud og vær lidt aktiv i forummet  

skunken skrev, for 12 timer siden:

. Vi har alt for mange der laver fake, hadfulde, eller reklame anmeldelser op og fælles for dem alle er at de er nye profiler . ud og vær lidt aktiv i forummet  

Sorry, but that's not true - that's just a "wannabe" misconception...

Why does a user in some threads first have to write:

"I agree, she's so wonderful",

"I agree, she's not worth the money",

...a few more questions and other meaningless "bla bla" (?) - he is then more credible (?) - for whom(?)... and why (?)...

....actually..... exactly this procedure "red light industry associated members" - have been using for years and also write hateful, unrealistic, invented stories - these are then more credible (?)

Yesterday a new user wrote a "WOOOW" review - is this user more credible than the TS in this thread(?)

.... if "you think/sort according to this "pattern" then soon we'll almost only have invented negative /positive stories from "agency members" or other "malicious fantasists" in the review threads.

A new user is no more and no less credible/incredible than someone who only writes : “I agree.... + nonsensical questions and other bla bla” in various review threads.

Hug

Redigeret 14. Maj, 2022 4 år af Tantra

Tantra skrev, for 21 minutter siden:

A new user is no more and no less credible/incredible than someone who only writes : “I agree.... + nonsensical questions and other bla bla” in various review threads.

It depends. I have followed some writers' advice that seems to fit my experience, and some that did not. It's true that you can not trust some just because they write something.

So correct that it is not the number, but with the number increases the possibility of understanding whether the author delivers quality or just quantity.

You also use the forum here as an aid to find the right customers that suit you, right?

AB455 skrev, for 38 minutter siden:

It depends. I have followed some writers' advice that seems to fit my experience, and some that did not. It's true that you can not trust some just because they write something.

So correct that it is not the number, but with the number increases the possibility of understanding whether the author delivers quality or just quantity.

As the saying goes: Quantity is a quality onto it's own.
But I don't really agree with that.
It's not a good judge of character.
Whats important is What someone writes, not how much.

Redigeret 14. Maj, 2022 4 år af Keaper

Keaper skrev, for 50 minutter siden:

Whats important is What someone writes, not how much.

Agree, but the more someone write the easier it is to judge the quality of what is written, the writers preferences and knowledge, which in the end lead to an indicator of the writer is trustworthy.

AB455 skrev, 1 time siden:

Agree, but the more someone write the easier it is to judge the quality of what is written, the writers preferences and knowledge, which in the end lead to an indicator of the writer is trustworthy.

Well, but it's only a small indicator.
It's the content that is important.
Some that has a lot of posts have gotten there by making lots of short or nonsense posts.
If it's a small number, but they are insightful and well written, that weighs heavier.
But one has to at the same time exercise caution, some are managers that can sell sand in the Sahara !
What I am getting at is that a new user can be equally, or even more credible then someone that has made many posts.

Redigeret 14. Maj, 2022 4 år af Keaper

Keaper skrev, for 1 time siden:

Well, but it's only a small indicator.
It's the content that is important.
Some that has a lot of posts have gotten there by making lots of short or nonsense posts.
If it's a small number, but they are insightful and well written, that weighs heavier.
But one has to at the same time exercise caution, some are managers that can sell sand in the Sahara !
What I am getting at is that a new user can be equally, or even more credible then someone that has made many posts.

I totally agree. I have actually nothing more to add. 

Did i say something that didn't fit with what you wrote?

Tantra skrev, for 5 timer siden:

Sorry, but that's not true - that's just a "wannabe" misconception...

Why does a user in some threads first have to write:

"I agree, she's so wonderful",

"I agree, she's not worth the money",

...a few more questions and other meaningless "bla bla" (?) - he is then more credible (?) - for whom(?)... and why (?)...

....actually..... exactly this procedure "red light industry associated members" - have been using for years and also write hateful, unrealistic, invented stories - these are then more credible (?)

Yesterday a new user wrote a "WOOOW" review - is this user more credible than the TS in this thread(?)

.... if "you think/sort according to this "pattern" then soon we'll almost only have invented negative /positive stories from "agency members" or other "malicious fantasists" in the review threads.

A new user is no more and no less credible/incredible than someone who only writes : “I agree.... + nonsensical questions and other bla bla” in various review threads.

Hug

Tantra, it was an adwise, not a must. And lets see if that User hfh, will ever write again or if it was yet another fake profil.

skunken skrev, 1 time siden:

Tantra, it was an adwise, not a must. 

....and I was just pointing, that a user who has made a few "bla bla" posts is no less and no more credible than a new user.

It is also possible that a user who writes a lot is able to sell " sand in the desert"( as @Keapersayd) - but in reality only writes unrealistic stories....
... in contrast, a new user can be a real, credible customer.

In this industry, different people meet: rich, poor, good, malicious, intelligent, vengeful... especially when men are anonymous in a forum, no one can know for sure what kind of person "hides" behind this or that avatar "- some are good actors, others are honest regardless of the length of time his profile has been on the site and regardless of the number of  posts.

In this particular case - the TS is indirectly "accused" of lying - so, thinking logically, I'm not sure if his silence should be interpreted as a "fake profile".
 After this "friendly greeting" in this thread, "he" may prefer to create a new profile - which is unfortunately possible here....

Tantra skrev, for 1 time siden:

....and I was just pointing, that a user who has made a few "bla bla" posts is no less and no more credible than a new user.

We don't know anything about the new user. We assume something from and old user, from what this user already have said. Can we be sure? No, but but it sure helps to make an opinion from that knowledge. And no, I don't think it helps just to write allot.

Tantra skrev, for 1 time siden:

In this particular case - the TS is indirectly "accused" of lying

That is your reading of what I assume must be my post. No one called TS a lier.

I put out my scepticism, I didn't say that's it wasn't true. I am not a fan of customers who lie about bad experience's like if she wouldn't give him a discount or if she refused for something she wasn't comfortable with. To often I have seen this newcomers trying to get revenge by posting a bad review. Therefore my scepticism. It's not TS fault, he could be real and could have given a fair and honest review. I don't know, do you?

A few days ago, I was defending why I believed in another newbies post. Did I know I was right and that he was truthfully? No, but other indicators told me that he could be right and without any other agenda that he just wanted to share his experiences.

Today we had a sad post about a GP that chooses to stop, in Denmark at least, due to an assault. It was from a quite angry newbie as well. Do I know it's true? No, but I for now I have chosen to believe it, because it could be true and the writer wouldn't have gained anything by lying.

There sure is a lot of lying in here, at least when someone are describing them self and there performances. I live with that and subtract a fair share of there tellings. But not infrequently I see a newbie without honor trying to ruin a GP's business, just because he didn't get it he's way. Sometimes they have even admit that they threaten the woman with a bad review. I find that kind of behavior disgusting.

So yes I'm sceptical because of what i have seen, but if I don't see anything obviously that rings a bell for me I welcome it at least liking the post and once in a while if i got the time, help them to put in the link or help them to move there post to the right forum.

skunken skrev, for 2 timer siden:

Why does a user in some threads first have to write:

"I agree, she's so wonderful",

"I agree, she's not worth the money",

 Maybe because they agree?

AB455 skrev, for 21 timer siden:

We don't know anything about the new user. We assume something from and old user, from what this user already have said. Can we be sure? No, but but it sure helps to make an opinion from that knowledge. And no, I don't think it helps just to write allot.

That is your reading of what I assume must be my post. No one called TS a lier.

I put out my scepticism, I didn't say that's it wasn't true. I am not a fan of customers who lie about bad experience's like if she wouldn't give him a discount or if she refused for something she wasn't comfortable with. To often I have seen this newcomers trying to get revenge by posting a bad review. Therefore my scepticism. It's not TS fault, he could be real and could have given a fair and honest review. I don't know, do you?

 

 

Just calm down and drink a cup of tea. Valerian has a calming effect.

I'm not your enemy... I'm a girl who was defamed herself by a malicious liar,  who is definitely not a newbie. The difference is that he is actually "haunting" me and trying to slander my name at every opportunity.

That is not the case here in this thread. 

After your "friendly greeting", the TS in this thread says absolutely nothing

You yourself have already written in this thread that you agree that the number of posts written does not determine credibility, then you even agree that one should be careful with who one trusts, because some longtime users  could be less than honest and might even be selling snow in the winter and then you spin again and tell that a new user did something here and there...
 You say you don't like liars - who do you think is lying in this thread (?) ... or do you judge someone just because they're new, because somewhere else, new user lied about something - do you think that's fair ( ? )
An experienced user can lie just as easily as a new user.

I don't know the Sara that this thread is about, I don't know the TS either.
I'm just communicating that a new user isn't necessarily less credible than an "experienced" user, - sometimes a newbie can even be more credible than an "experienced" user...
....and I don't allow myself to judge who is more or less credible.

Your "skepticism", as you call it, "with which you very energetically counter the TS in this thread is not particularly fair.

Tantra skrev, for 4 timer siden:

Just calm down and drink a cup of tea. Valerian has a calming effect.

Fair enough. I was... emotional in the moment and that slipped through to my writing. Now you know the secret. Men have feelings as well, but don't tell anyone 

Tantra skrev, for 4 timer siden:

I'm not your enemy... I'm a girl who was defamed herself by a malicious liar,  who is definitely not a newbie. The difference is that he is actually "haunting" me and trying to slander my name at every opportunity

I'm sorry to hear that happens for you as well. It seems that it is quite common in the business, unfortunately.

Tantra skrev, for 4 timer siden:

You yourself have already written in this thread that you agree that the number of posts written does not determine credibility, then you even agree that one should be careful with who one trusts, because some longtime users  could be less than honest and might even be selling snow in the winter and then you spin again and tell that a new user did something here and there...

True.

Regarding this post, I have all too often seen that it is a despised customer who wants revenge when a new user sets up to do just that.

Regarding existing and active users, I have some opportunity to assess how the person is or wants to be. It does not make me confident, but more confident.

Tantra skrev, for 4 timer siden:

You say you don't like liars - who do you think is lying in this thread (?) ... or do you judge someone just because they're new, because somewhere else, new user lied about something - do you think that's fair ( ? )
An experienced user can lie just as easily as a new user.

I do not know if anyone is lying. But I'm more suspicious if it's a new user and if it's an experienced user who in previous posts shows a lack of respect and understanding.

Yes, anybody can tell a lie and often i won't be able to see what's truthfully and what's not. But I do be more or less sceptical for many reasons. 

Tantra skrev, for 4 timer siden:

Your "skepticism", as you call it, "with which you very energetically counter the TS in this thread is not particularly fair.

You are right in one thing. It isn't fair for TS. It isn't he's fault that to many new users try to use this platform as an weapon simply to assert he's power against there business.

This forum gives users some power over sex workers business and it should therefore be used with respect and caution.

I think TS should defend his post, if he mean something about it and not just want to hit the woman's career because of something irrelevant for other than what happened between the two of them. I don't see how this is different from any other assembly.

If it's the first thing you do in a new group of people is to complain (or praise), with an assertion, it is to often not the full truth at least.

If someone lie about god quality, it could cost some men some poorly spent money. If you lie about a sex workers business the damage could go much worse.

I do hope TS will attend and elaborate on his claim.

Tilbage til anmeldelse.   Jeres interne fnidder kan i tage Pm. 
Keeper