http://side6.dk/6-nyt/kvinde-med-toprolle-i-centralbank-afsloeret-som-nazi-domina/5561985

Måske satte hun indtjeningen i en anden bank?

Ellers flytter hun dem nok 

hmmm - det undrer mig egentlig at man bare sådan kan fyre hende for noget sexuelt, som hun har foretaget i fritiden.

Men følgende kilde giver lidt mere information omkring hvorfor - det ser mere ud til at være bi-effekterne, såsom skatteundragelse, der er årsagerne:

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/woman-fired-for-being-a-prostitute-by-dutch-central-bank-1.2175923

From a work point of view, there seems little doubt that Ms van der Waal contravened the central bank’s code of conduct, which forbids “indecent behaviour” – and stipulates that no employee should act in a way which could harm the reputation of the bank or lead to negative publicity.

More broadly, prostitution is legal in the Netherlands, so she is in the clear from that point of view. However, sex workers are expected to register with their local chamber of commerce, have a VAT number, and pay income tax, none of which Ms van der Waal appears to have done – leaving herself open to possible legal action for back taxes.