Emily C - super dejlig Valentines date

[FlemmingP 292]

• 
• 
• 

Jeg tog en udfordring op fra https://nympho.dk/n21061/7232/emily-let-me-help-you-connect-with-your-sexuality-and-reach-new-pleasure som på Nympho spurgte om jeg (eller en af de mange andre læsere på sitet) skulle være hendes Valentines date. Det blev en dejlig oplevelse.

Emily, der er fra Finland, er p.t. bosiddene i Danmark, og jeg kan forstå på hende, at vi nok kan glæde os over hendes selskab i en rum tid fremover, det siger jeg tak for. Emily er anmeldt positivt på Nympho, men som der har været nævnt under 'Efterlysninger', så kan man måske ikke helt regne med at eventuelle negative anmeldelser overlever på det site, så derfor skriver jeg også lige her, hvor troværdigheden måske nok er lidt større, selvom jeg også har anmeldt Emily på Nympho.

Emily er en rigtig dejlig og sød pige, meget nem at tale med, og vi havde en skøn tid sammen med intenst og varmt samvær. Da jeg bestilte tid, havde jeg givet Emily mit eroguide alias, og hun havde studeret nogle af mine andre anmeldelser - og hun gjorde opmærksom på, at hun ikke ønskede at være med i en porno novelle på Eroguide .

Det respekterer jeg naturligvis, så derfor slipper i for en detaljeret beskrivelse af de intime detaljer. Hun skriver i sin annoncering, at hun ikke er en f*uckdoll, jeg ved ikke om jeg helt rigtig ved hvad det er, jeg tænker at hun som alle andre i branchen ønsker respekt, og det får man også selv. Det betyder ikke, at hun ikke er super lækker og dejlig at være sammen med, det er hun!

 

 

Redigeret 14. Februar af FlemmingP

[½angel 1375]

Tak for den korte anmeldelse.
Jeg vil dog lige nævne at det skævvrider lidt din anmeldelse , hvis du allerede fra start af fortæller at du vil skrive en anmeldelse af hende, eller dit Ero-alias.
Jeg har tidligere spurgt Gp'er´, om de gerne ville have at jeg skrev en anmeldelse efter sexen, mange har sagt ja, tak, to har spurgt om jeg lige kunne holde en detalje eller to ude, da det ikke er ydelser, de normalt giver (det vælger jeg at tro på, især da én fra start sagde at en ydelse hun ikke gav, men da vi var igang og det gik rigtig godt for os begge, spurgt hun selv om den, og det var ikke noget jeg betalte for).
Og selvfølgeligt dem som har givet dårlig service som jeg vil advare jer herinde mod, spørger jeg ikke.

[FlemmingP 292]

½angel skrev, for 15 timer siden:

Tak for den korte anmeldelse.
Jeg vil dog lige nævne at det skævvrider lidt din anmeldelse , hvis du allerede fra start af fortæller at du vil skrive en anmeldelse af hende, eller dit Ero-alias.
 

Jo, det med at give alias på forhånd er måske lidt tvivlsomt, jeg gav det for at hun ikke skulle tro at der kom en eller anden random psycho, i sin annoncering gør Emily i fed skrift opmærksom på at hun 'works independently'. At hun godt ville anmeldes, spurgte jeg om efter. Og de sådan lidt 'noget for, noget imod' oplevelser gider jeg ikke skrive om.

[C.Emily. 7]

Reviews and online presence is valuable for both parties included in this business. Intimate services (especially when working incall) can be a nervous/unsafe experience for providers, as well as the guests.

I appreciate and support reviews as they are a great tool to gain credibility in an unregulated and stigmatized field where people are still ready to invest a lot of their safety and money. I think it speaks volumes for Flemming P's character here, that he chose to inclose his alias when reaching out. For me it was the main reason why I chose to see him.

If your attitude is automatically not to inclose your online alias because you're assuming that the service provider will be more relaxed or performing with less professionalism or care, it's very sad and tells a lot about how you guests (don't want to use the word gentlemen as there are all gender, couples etc out there) need to be wary of bad experiences and scammers. And how we on the other side suffer from the same. In the UK for example this is approached much better (providers rate their guests more on the platforms etc.) and guests use more time on selecting and are more aware in their consumerism on the overall communication and professionalism rather than just choosing based on the fetish or looks.

I wonder if there is another purpose on in your mind than of just wanting to protect the guests safety and that way not allowing that same protection to the providers who are willing to take the same risk everyday for their guests, mister Angel?

Kisses,

Emily C.

[½angel 1375]

C.Emily. skrev, for 11 timer siden:

I wonder if there is another purpose on in your mind than of just wanting to protect the guests safety and that way not allowing that same protection to the providers who are willing to take the same risk everyday for their guests, mister Angel?

Sorry for the comparison, but I only use it as a analogy on the situation, but if a Food critic tells the chef in advance, that they are going to write a review of the resturant, we all know the chef wil have bottles of champain, the cutest waitress and the best table ready that day for the food critic. Where there's a big chance that, thats not the service everyday guests would get.

I don't tell my handle or that I'm going to witte a review before, I know the level of service the woman provides, because it can distort, how others would be treated. I sometimes tell it after, as already written. I'm all for safty for the provideres, I would have no problem, if guests would be reviewed the same way as provideres. I do think, I'm a good guest, always treat a woman with respect and honesty. But every guest has had bad expericenses, just like the providers have, and I see this forum as a place to warn other guest about bad providers, so they can spend their time and money with good ones.

It sounds that you and FlemmingP had a great time together, and you sound like a lovely woman with great service. My comment wasn't meanspirited towards you or FlemmingP, just a comment on how to keep a review objectiv.

[C.Emily. 7]

I see your point but as it happens we are not fine dining establishments, even though some of us share many of the same goals and values in our work of service. As an old sommelier I know.. It is a reality that the bad apples and  individuals, in providers as well as guests, make it harder for some of us.

 

I do not in any way discredit the importance of this website and the reviews. I am for them. All the people whom I welcome and spend time with have the same right to write a review of me online after the meeting, may the warn me about it beforehand or not. Why I like the reviews is because I truly care about my guests' enjoyment and safety. I only asked mr FlemmingP not to write explicit/graphic about our date but in the end it was his choice. The only thing I'm trying to voice here is that it turns me on and makes me feel supported and seen when my guests extend me the same safety back, like Mr FlemmingP did here, by sharing some online credibility. It saddened me that your instant thought and worry was to discredit the review and experience when you read that he had included his online alias to me when it could have been seen as a gentlemanly gesture of to quote "letting me know I'm not meeting a random psycho".

 

When a food critic from Politiken comes to a new wine&dine in town, the owner indeed does rally the staff up, will pop the nice bubbles and hover around the table. But everyone knows who they are (most knowing that will tell about their arrival in advance) and all the cards are on the table. It seems you are a person who values authenticity and I see now that your motive is purely not to be a supporter of food critics who will take the special treatment and bubbles and then wrote an amazing review as a thank you and hence be bought out by the establishment.

 

But why your metaphor doesn't work here. The risk providers take every time when meeting someone new are *far greater* than just simply losing some money or time. However it's my own choice and luckily I do like my lovely guests and want to give them the best. It's not the same for some other providers out there.

 

Thank you for an interesting exchange. I appreciate you answering and sharing your thoughts.

 

XX, Emily

[C.Emily. 7]

Ps. I did take Mr FlemmingP deeper in my ass and was more eager to have him to fuck the life out of me while I was softly asking for it. Not because I knew he might write about it. It was because he's a good man and knew that to truly get a woman (even with high sexuality like mine) to dive into deep pleasures they have to feel safe and well treated.